E-commerce automation is the work of keeping several systems agreeing with each other — supplier feeds, storefront inventory, order records and email flows — so nobody has to start the day deciding which system to believe.
None of the individual pieces are exotic. The value is that the daily reconciliation stops being a person.
Fixed scope, fixed price, and a 100% money-back guarantee for 7 days after handover.
When two systems disagree about stock, the real cost is not the double data entry. It is that nobody trusts either system, so somebody starts a third copy in a spreadsheet — and now there are three sources of truth and none. Overselling a line you cannot fulfil costs more than the automation that would have prevented it.
The first build is almost always the same: several supplier feeds, arriving in different shapes on different schedules, syncing into one inventory picture so the number on the storefront is the real one. Done properly this includes the unglamorous parts — retries when a feed is late, handling a supplier who changed their column headers without telling anyone, and a record of what synced so a re-run cannot double-count.
Order confirmation, shipping updates, review requests, replenishment reminders, win-backs on customers who went quiet. Each one is individually obvious and collectively never quite finished, because they are always losing to something more urgent. An email sequence is $1,249 and takes a day; the reason to do it is not sophistication, it is that it stops being contingent on anybody remembering.
We have built this shape: supplier feeds syncing into one inventory picture, post-purchase email flows running on their own, and reporting that reflects what is actually selling rather than what sold last month. None of those three is remarkable alone. Wired together properly they take the daily reconciliation work off a person entirely — which is usually what a good automation project actually looks like.
Yes — this is the most common e-commerce build we are asked for. Multiple feeds in different formats and on different schedules are reconciled into one stock figure that the storefront reads. The parts that matter are the ones that are not in a demo: retries when a feed is late, handling a supplier who silently changed their format, and a synced-record log so a re-run cannot double-count.
It depends on how many systems are involved. Workflow Automation is $1,499 for a simple build (3-8 steps, 1-2 systems), $2,999 for standard (8-15 steps, 2-3 systems), and $4,999 for complex (15-25 steps, 3-5 systems). An API integration connecting two systems in one direction is from $1,499. Email sequences are $1,249. The tier is scoped in a free audit so the price is fixed before anyone builds.
Yes, and with most platforms that expose an API. The storefront platform is usually the easy end of the problem — the hard part is nearly always the supplier side, where feeds arrive in inconsistent formats from businesses with no obligation to tell you when they change something. That is where the engineering actually goes.
A well-built sync notices and stops loudly rather than quietly importing garbage. This is the specific failure that damages an inventory system: mangled data is worse than no data, because it is trusted. Our builds skip bad input, flag it for a person, and name the step that failed — and on Managed Automation from $499/mo, adapting to the change is our job rather than yours.
Thirty minutes, no charge. You leave with a written list of what is worth automating, what is not, and roughly what each would cost — and that list is yours whether you hire us or not.